Finding the Best “Road Safety Audit” Location

You might have noticed this passing, intriguing reference in Jessica Dyer’s 12/17/19 Journal story on tweaked signal timing and new “Signals Set for 30 MPH” signs going up on Lead and Coal Avenues after lengthy advocacy by neighbors along the corridor between I-25 and San Mateo.

As part of a larger Lead/Coal strategy, the city had in October asked the U.S. Federal Highway Administration to conduct a road safety audit of the corridor – something area residents requested.

But a spokesman for the city’s Department of Municipal Development said it is no longer pursuing the federal analysis of the area. The audit would obligate the city to pay for recommended changes, and funding is a factor, according to DMD spokesman Johnny Chandler. Since the city is already actively working on changes to Lead and Coal, he said it would instead seek a federal analysis of another, undetermined roadway where the recommendations might be more useful.

I don’t know what’s more intriguing in the latter paragraph above:

  1. “The audit would obligate the city to pay for recommended charges…” or,
  2. “…would instead seek a federal analysis of another, undetermined roadway where the recommendations would be more useful.”

While #1 offers fun, yet highly unlikely “obligate” (e.g., “The federal government today obligated City of Albuquerque spend $19 million for a new bike/ped overpass of I-25 at Silver Blvd.“), more realistic fun is trying to figure out what “undetermined roadway” will be seen as best choice for a federal road safety audit.

For insight into this, the City (and we) need to consult the findings of the data collection and mapping process called the “High Fatality and Injury Network,” and known as “HFIN” because government and acronyms go together like peanut butter and chocolate.

hfin 1
The HFIN map is basically a visual process of finding the red line segments (road stretches) and red circles (intersections) denoting high rates of fatal and injurious crashes.
hfin 3
The HFIN findings shown here tell us why Lead/Coal has not been chosen for the federal road safety audit. While the clicked upon stretch of Mountain under I-25 in this screengrab shows an astronomical “HFIN Score” of 2731 (about the highest in the City), you’ll notice Lead and Coal segments through the neighborhoods of Nob Hill don’t show as yellow/orange or red, having far lower HFIN Scores.

HFIN scores are calculated on a rate of fatal/injury crashes per mile factoring in length of a particular segment. Hence, the very short segment of Mountain clicked upon above has a giant HFIN score in part because of its ridiculous dangerousness and in part due to its brevity.

HFIN 4
Lead and Coal have plenty of crashes through Nob Hill, but as shown here, relatively few of them are fatal or injurious (i.e., HFIN score of 183 for Lead between University and Yale).

Clicking on just about all of the red segments/circles on the HFIN Map for the highest HFIN scores and keeping in mind the skewing of small segments, here’s a shortlist of best “undetermined roadway” options for the next federal road safety audit:

hfin 5
Coors Blvd anywhere near Paseo del Norte, Eagle Ranch, and Cottonwood Mall. What a death trap.
hfin 6
Pretty much San Mateo and “Anything,” particularly north/south of Montgomery. Note: San Mateo has some weird jurisdictional aspect that makes it a City stroad, but not, but it is. Such governmental choppiness is also in place along Coors (State, County, City) and Gibson Blvd. (Federal because of the Air Force Base, nuclear weapons).
hfin 8
My personal “sleeper” pick, University from I-40 through intersection at Menaul. This area of truck stops and hotels isn’t thought about much by us locals, but there are tons of tourists and denizens without political power (e.g., folks who hang around truck stops) getting killed and injured here.
hfin 9
And we can’t forget any section of Central Avenue, especially those segments east of San Pedro through the Fairgrounds and on all the way to Tramway. The length of these segments crimps their HFIN scores, while that same length between signalized intersections heightens the danger. The upcoming placement of a HAWK signal at Central and Texas is just one of many improvements an audit might “obligate” the City for along this stretch.

There are, unfortunately, plenty of other dangerous candidates for such an audit. Readers are encouraged to consult the HFIN Map to check numbers on their own “favorites.” It will be interesting to see which intersection wins this “contest,” yet the truth is a single audit or three isn’t what’s truly needed; however, the far more important systematic revamping of ABQ/County streets and stroads with a strong Vision Zero lens isn’t how this stuff works, or pretends to work.

Piecemeal. Always piecemeal.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s